What is
Great Leadership?
Over
the course of my MSLD studies, my notions and/or assumptions of leadership have
changed. In one area, the change was learning
of leadership methodologies that I could use, another proverbial ‘tool’ to put
into my leadership ‘toolbox’. Yet, in
another area – the concept of leadership – the change was significant in that I
now view leadership differently. I
realized two things. First, there is no such thing as a ‘bad’ leader. Second, being a leader requires a relationship with followers.
From
the age of 18 and through to 39 years old, I witnessed leadership through the
lens of the Army culture. The Army had a
philosophy for transformational leadership, that is, to inspire and motivate followers. The Army’s leadership model is Be, Know, Do (Department of the Army, 2006) . Yet, in actuality, many “leaders” in the Army
practiced transactional leadership. Transactional
leadership was getting people to do something through simple reward and punishment. As a result, many “followers” worked out of
fear of reprisal rather than being inspired by a transcendent purpose.
I once viewed leadership and management as
synonymous, as did many others. It was
common to refer to someone that ‘outranked’ you as a leader whether he or she
had leader attributes or not. Leadership
was considered inherent with a job position.
Therefore, soldiers categorized ‘good’ or ‘bad’ leaders. Yet, I realize now that there were no ‘bad
leaders’, they were really just people in a position of authority. Boyatzis & McKee (2005) wrote that leadership is
a relationship, that one cannot be a leader without followers. Thus, those ‘bad leaders’ never had
followers, they had subordinates that simply complied either to receive reward
or avoid punishment. These persons (aka ‘bad
leaders’) had the following tendencies; they were egocentric, lacked compassion
and/or empathy, were confrontational, and lacked trust in their relationships
to name a few. It was apparent which
organizations had these ‘bad leaders’ because teamwork was supplanted by individual
interest i.e. personal survival.
Fortunately,
there were also many great leaders in the Army.
One great leader that I looked up to was transformational. He had traits and tendencies that resonated throughout the organization
and his followers. This good leader
built relationships with the follower and his or her family. He was trusting and empowered followers. As a result, the organization had a family
feel where each person strived to do his or her best so as to not let other
down. Lastly, this good leader ‘led by
example’. He made sure that he was of
sound mind and body and sought to achieve mastery in all aspects of life, and
he challenged others to do the same.
References
Boyatzis,
R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard
Business School Publishing.
Department of the
Army. (2006). Army Leadership. Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
No comments:
Post a Comment