I believe that
this course was invaluable to my personal, educational, and professional
growth. The only negative aspect was the
pace at which I had to conduct my studies and work. I feel that I could have ‘grown’ more
intellectually if given more time to synthesize and apply the concepts of
critical thinking. Yet, I say this
understanding that my situation results from an accelerated nine-week term. More so, I may even say that I may not fully
learn everything even if MSLD 500 was several weeks longer. Further adding to the problem was the fact
that I was taking three graduate courses simultaneously and working! I had pursued my education with the intent of
getting as much done in as little time as possible. Although I always put forth my best effort, I
realize that I imposed irrational limits to my learning, that is, ‘learn only
what you need to learn to get through it’.
The critical thinking teachings of this course opened my eyes to my error.
The self-reflection blog provided me an
avenue to look at myself as a student. I
had never done this before. What I am
learning is not isolated to academia but is useful in all aspects of my life. Therefore, I have gained appreciation of the
knowledge I am given and the mentorship from my professors. The topics covering action research were
especially helpful and relevant. I now have
a better understanding of the distinct differences between quantitative and
qualitative research. Moreover, I
recognize the value that each method offers.
I think one way that the university can provide additional support for
learning is to collaborate more with aerospace companies and create real-world
case studies or problems that students can work on. One criticism I have heard from leaders/managers
is ‘yes, you have the knowledge but have you proven it to work on x, y, or z
problem?’ Overall, my experience with this course is positive and I believe the
teachings in critical thinking will undoubtedly help in future courses.
No comments:
Post a Comment